Franchise Lawyer

Licensing, Technology Transfers,
Distribution and Franchise Solutions

More Franchise Information

FRANCHISE COMPLIANCE – THE FRANCHISEE’S SIDE OF THE LEDGER

Author Richard Solomon is a Franchise Lawyer with four decades of experience in business development, antitrust and franchise law, management counseling and dispute resolution including trials and crisis management.

 

      I wrote a tutorial on the nature and manner of franchise compliance from the perspective of the franchisor a few years back. Since then I have seen many situations in which franchisees have incurred disastrous losses because they failed to appreciate the nuances of compliance by a franchisee, and that failure presented opportunities for their franchisor or a company that acquired their franchisor to take away their whole business without compensation.

      If you are a franchisee and don’t want to lose everything, you need to read, understand and follow the principles outlined below.

      Your franchise agreement contains many provisions in addition to those requiring you to do what you are told and pay money to your franchisor on time. You probably never read them, and if you did, you didn’t appreciate what they mean. There are many “boilerplate” (contained in every franchise agreement) provisions that deal with financial transactions, intellectual property protection, ownership and transfer, consents and rights of refusal.

      If you forget about these and do certain things that seem perfectly normal in any non-franchise business context, without following the requirements of the contract, your franchisor may declare you in default, and the default will in some instances not have a cure opportunity. You could simply be terminated and lose everything.

      You may have done whatever you did that failed to comply with your obligations under these provisions many years ago. They didn’t affect the day to day operations of your franchise or relate to your normal monthly reporting routines. The fact that the franchisor failed to discover the failure to comply until many years later may not excuse what you did or failed to do.

      This particular agony arises normally and usually in connection with your desire to renew the franchise for another term; sell the franchise; buy another franchise; change the company form (Corp, LLC, etc); pass the franchise ownership to your next generation. In each of these instances it is customary for your franchisor to conduct an “audit” (not really an audit, but an examination of the manner of your compliance with all the provisions of the franchise agreement) to determine whether you could be held to have breached the agreement.

      Today we see some companies accused of discrimination because of the franchisee perception that certain groups are being targeted for termination. In one such lawsuit, the franchisor is accused of trying to rid itself of its brown skinned franchisees in a scheme to enhance its opportunity for a very successful IPO. While that seems ridiculous on its face at first blush, it did signal that certain franchisees were being inspected, “audited” and noticed for termination in an other than customary manner.

      Most franchisees think of an inspection as a visit from a field rep looking for unauthorized products, adverse conditions in the store, failure to comply with various daily operational requirements. Inspection deficiencies usually are noted in written inspection reports that are reviewed with the franchisee for purposes of getting the franchisee to spruce up for another inspection to come shortly to see if the problems have been fixed. If they are attended to, the franchisee is not at risk in most instances.

      Most franchisees think of “audits” as examination of their financial records to assure proper reporting and payment of what is required by the franchise agreement. The contracts require that errors/under reporting be corrected, with penalties and interest and payment for the expenses of the “audit”. Repeated examination of financial records comes with an initial finding of under reporting, and it is customary for the agreement to provide for termination without cure if there are repeated financial defaults.

      That accounts for the “performance” requirements as understood by almost all franchisees. That is simply insufficient sensitivity to franchisee obligations and may get you terminated or refused renewal rights, or refused consent to sell the business and realize the full going concern value you may have built up over the years.

      Transactions in which you omit to think of the more “boilerplate” provisions of the franchise agreement are often present in a non franchised business. If you borrow money, what happens in the transaction is just between you and your lender.

      In franchising, if you borrow money and there is a security agreement that is signed in connection with the loan, as there almost always is with any commercial lender, the security agreement is written to encumber every asset you have, to maximize the lender’s secured position. By definition, that would include your rights under your franchise agreement. However, your franchise agreement doesn’t allow that without the written consent of the franchisor. A rational franchisor will be used to dealing with the requirements of commercial lenders and either be willing to consent, or may have a rider that exempts the franchise rights from the security agreement, that banks will usually agree to if handled correctly.

      That means that you start your loan arrangements sooner to provide time to work out the consent of the franchisor. If you do the loan without the franchisor’s consent, the franchisor may claim that you have encumbered the franchise rights in violation of at least two covenants in your franchise agreement. The first would be the covenant not to alienate or encumber the franchise rights; and the second would be the covenant against attempting to permit or license anyone other than the named franchisee to have rights to use the name or other intellectual property of the franchisor.

      Another area in which franchisees tend to omit to comply with franchise agreement consent obligations is the matter of changing ownership of the franchisee’s company. This includes changing from a sole proprietorship or LLC to a corporation without the franchisor’s prior written consent; and bringing family members into the business. The franchise agreement makes allowances for a tax planning or financial planning need to change the form of your business, but prior written franchisor approval is required. Almost no one thinks to do this because it seems so ordinary and simple a thing that people do in business. But without prior approval, it is a breach of the approval requirement; the intellectual property protection covenants; and the franchisor’s right of first refusal of transfers or partial transfers provision.

      Refugee franchisees seem always to be unaware in any conscious sense that these standard contract provisions are involved in matters that in any normal non franchised business would never be in play. They tend to think that if they operate the business properly and pay what they owe when it is due, they are home free. That simply is not true.

      In many franchise agreements there are other related agreements that are part of the overall franchise transaction. These include lease agreements and financing agreements if the business is one in which there is the use of floor plan financing.

      In such situations, the franchise agreements always provide that a default regarding any one of these other agreements will also cause a default of the franchise agreement. That’s called cross default amongst more than one agreement and is always the case in any competently drafted franchise agreement.

      Your store premises lease will usually have a rider permitting the franchisor to take over the location and lease obligations if you default. In these riders, the landlord usually consents in advance to the takeover when there is a default of the lease. You can be evicted summarily according to the agreement language. You may get a delay from a judge for various reasons, but when you get right down to it, you are in default and the cross default provisions are always enforceable. In the usual case you lose your entire business, and you may have residual liability on the lease despite being dispossessed, and breach of contract damages liability under the franchise agreement. If you are very lucky and find some kind soul judge who pressures your franchisor to allow you to cure the defaults, and you are able to do so, you have spent many thousands of dollars just in your own legal fees, plus whatever it costs to cure the defaults and pay the franchisor’s lawyers.

      There is in every franchise agreement a provision that requires the franchisee to operate the business in compliance with all laws, statutes, ordinances and regulations that may pertain to the business. The list of laws that you may violate and put your entire franchised business at risk is a long list. Consider that if you file an improper income or sales tax return, you are in default of the franchise agreement. That’s just one on many possible examples.

      There are also financial responsibility default provisions in every franchise agreement. Under these provisions, insolvency, bankruptcy and failure to satisfy or remove and judgment or lien within thirty days puts you in default.

      There are many more ways to lose your franchised business than your are normally cognizant of. When you want anything from your franchisor, it is quite customary for your franchisor to do an “audit” of your compliance. The “auditors” they send out have check lists that tie into every possible way in which you could have defaulted in some way under some provision of your franchise agreement. If the “auditor” finds defaults, you may not receive consents; you may not have a cure opportunity; you may not be allowed to renew your franchise; you may not be permitted to sell your franchised business; and you may be terminated.

      When you contemplate any transaction that could in any manner affect obligations under your franchise agreement that you may not be aware of, you really must have it vetted in advance by a very competent franchise attorney. A lawyer who is not a franchise lawyer may not – probably won’t – have the experience and sensitivity to appreciate the interrelationships of the various provisions of your franchise agreement.

      You do yourself a grave injustice if you fail to get this prior vetting of your proposed transactions by a franchise lawyer just because you don’t want to spend money for the legal fees. Those legal fees will save your business from ruin and save you from default liability under your loans, your leases and your franchise agreement(s).

      If there is no franchise lawyer in your community, that makes no difference. Documents can be sent to any franchise lawyer you may engage, and you may be advised by telephone and email. You can find good franchise lawyer assistance on the Internet. Just Google up “franchise lawyer” or “franchise lawyer in (name your city or state)”. There is no excuse for putting yourself in danger by neglecting responsibilities.
 

Copyright 1997 - 2008 || Richard A. Solomon || Site Map  ||   ||

Franchise, Crisis, Antitrust, Counsel, Litigation, Due Diligence, Association, Strategy, Tactics, Fraud, Prevent, International, Analysis, Emergency, Franchising, Specialized Tutorials, Richard A. Solomon, Attorney, Law.

Licensing, Technology Transfers,
Distribution and Franchise Solutions